Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Counter Guarantee Dispute. Claim Barred by Limitation and Failure to Prove Invocation of Guarantee.

The petitioner, Punjab and Maharashtra Co-op. Bank Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Husband Jointly and Severally Liable for Wife's Debit Balance in Stock Trading Account — Oral Contract for Joint Liability Falls Within Scope of BSE Bye-law 248(a) Arbitration Clause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by AC Chokshi Share Broker Private Limited against the order of the Bombay High Court's division bench, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Dispute Over Encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee After Full Contractual Performance. Arbitration Clause Covers Dispute Despite Completion of Contract and Payment.

The petitioner, M/S Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Explain 17-Month Delay in Seeking to Add New Ground Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.), filed a Chamber Summons seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.

The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether Aurangabad Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for Property in Hingoli. District Court Held It Lacked Jurisdiction; Appeal Outcome Not Provided.

The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s Kasliwal Empire, formed by the appellant and respondent on 7.3.2007 for developing housing projects. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute Over Arbitral Interim Order. Court Holds That an Order Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Is Not an 'Award' Under Article 11 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Thus No Stamp Duty Is Payable.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Show Justification for Incorporating New Ground 17 Months After Filing Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.) seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition chall...