Search Results for "Infrastructure Charges"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, challenged a notice dated 28.3.2011 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...