Search Results for "Girnar Traders case"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Girnar Traders case"

153 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Article 226 Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act. Petitioner's land reserved for Public Health Center in Sangamner Development Plan deemed released as Municipal Council failed to acquire within ten years of purchase notice.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Sumanbai Uttam Gadekar, is the owner of land bearing Gut No.179 (Hissa No.1+9B/A) old Survey No.759 situated at Sangamner, District Ah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Reservation Lapses Only Upon Valid Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, Not Mere Passage of Time. The court ruled that without a valid notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, the High Court cannot declare reserved land free from reservation even after an inordinate delay.

13 Mar 2023

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by three pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Shops in Municipal Council Pathri — Petitioners Failed to Establish Right Over Public Property. Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land Without Permission Cannot Be Regularized Under Section 52 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

13 Mar 2020

The petitioners, 29 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their shops by the Municipal Council, Pathri, and seeking regular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Trust Land. Held that the Municipal Corporation's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was valid as the construction was on public property and no prior notice was required for demolition of unauthorized structures on public land.

20 Mar 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of structures by the Municipal Corporation of Great...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Passing Off Action Over Identical Trademark 'LEAKGUARD' — Prior User and Reputation Established by Plaintiff Since 1999. The Court held that the Plaintiffs had made out a strong prima facie case of prior user and reputation, and the balance of convenience was in their favor, warranting an interim injunction.

9 Sep 2015

The Plaintiffs, Pidilite Industries Limited and Hardcastle & Waud Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a suit for passing off against the Defendants, Vilas N...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)