Search Results for "Electricity Theft"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Supplementary Electricity Bill for Violation of Natural Justice. Appellate Order Dismissing Appeal Without Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, a consumer with electricity connection No.32303/01456/5, received a supplementary bill of Rs.2,21,635.73 from the respondent power com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in House Trespass Case — Conviction Based on Testimony of Injured Eyewitnesses and Motive of Theft and Removal from Service.

The appellant, Sadashiv Basappa Madgyal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Sections 302, 324 and 452 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge and Common Intention. Conviction under Section 304 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Appellants Knew the Electric Wire Was Lethal.

The appellants, Vilas Hari Kulmethe and Laxman Kanhu Pendam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 229(A) IPC for Theft of Electricity Due to Lack of Sanction. Prosecution Failed to Obtain Mandatory Consent Under Section 50 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Before Framing Additional Charge.

The applicants, Uddhavrao Nivrutti Sarkale, Markand Uddhavrao Sarkale, and Sau. Anandibai Uddhavrao Sarkale, were accused in RCC No.381/2001 pending b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457, 380, 342, 427 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused and recovery of stolen articles.

The appellant, Polisha Ganpat Pawar, was convicted by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik on April 12, 2002 in Sessions Case No.175 of 2001 for ...