Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Supplementary Electricity Bill for Violation of Natural Justice. Appellate Order Dismissing Appeal Without Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a consumer with electricity connection No.32303/01456/5, received a supplementary bill of Rs.2,21,635.73 from the respondent power company. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal before the appellate authority (Respondent No.3), which was dismissed by order dated 16.03.2024. The petitioner then approached the High Court seeking to quash the supplementary bill and the appellate order, and for refund of the amount deposited. The court noted that the appellate authority had dismissed the appeal without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which was a clear violation of principles of natural justice. The court also observed that the supplementary bill was issued without proper notice. Consequently, the court quashed the appellate order and the supplementary bill, and remanded the matter to the appellate authority for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the bill amount within four weeks, and upon such deposit, the appellate authority was to decide the appeal within eight weeks. The petition was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Supplementary Bill - Natural Justice - Sections 126, 127, 135, 154 Electricity Act, 2003 - Petitioner challenged supplementary bill of Rs.2,21,635.73 and appellate order dated 16.03.2024 - Court held that the appellate authority dismissed the appeal without affording opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice - Supplementary bill quashed and matter remanded for fresh hearing (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the supplementary bill issued by the power company and the appellate order dismissing the appeal without hearing the petitioner are sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The order dated 16.03.2024 passed in Appeal No. 23 of 2017 by Respondent No.3 and the supplementary bill No. 2483 dated 05.09.2017 issued by Respondent No.2 are quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the appellate authority for fresh hearing. The petitioner is directed to deposit 25% of the bill amount within four weeks. Upon such deposit, the appellate authority shall decide the appeal within eight weeks after hearing the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Electricity supply
  • Supplementary bill
  • Limitation for appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 853

R/Special Civil Application No. 2607 of 2025

2026-03-16

Hemant M. Prachchhak

2026:GUJHC:19787

Fouzan N Soniwala for Petitioner, Mr. Angesh Panchal AGP for Respondent No.1,3, Ms. Lilu K Bhaya for Respondent No.2

Hifzul Rehman Moriswala

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to supplementary electricity bill and appellate order dismissing appeal without hearing.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of supplementary bill and appellate order, refund of amount deposited.

Filing Reason

Petitioner received supplementary bill of Rs.2,21,635.73 and appeal was dismissed without hearing.

Previous Decisions

Appeal No. 23 of 2017 dismissed by Respondent No.3 on 16.03.2024.

Issues

Whether the appellate order dismissing the appeal without hearing the petitioner violates principles of natural justice. Whether the supplementary bill is sustainable without proper notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the appellate authority dismissed the appeal without giving any opportunity of hearing. Petitioner contended that the supplementary bill was issued without proper notice.

Ratio Decidendi

An appellate authority must afford an opportunity of hearing to the appellant before dismissing the appeal; failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the order void.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellate authority has dismissed the appeal without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The supplementary bill is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

Petitioner received supplementary bill on 05.09.2017. Filed Appeal No. 23 of 2017 before Respondent No.3. Appeal dismissed on 16.03.2024. Petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 2607 of 2025 before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Electricity Act, 2003: 126, 127, 135, 154
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Acquisition Proceedings Declared Lapsed. Non-payment of Compensation and Non-possession of Acquired Land for Over Five Years Resulted in Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Lan...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Defendant Company in Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute; Agreement Confining Jurisdiction to Bombay Courts Held Binding. Contractual Clause Selecting Bombay Courts Among Multiple Competent Forums Did Not Violate Section 28 of Indi...