Search Results for "DRAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "DRAT order"

174 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 174 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes DRAT Order Imposing Pre-deposit on Tenant Under SARFAESI Act -- Petitioner, Neither Borrower Nor Guarantor, Not Required to Deposit 40% for Appeal -- Appeal Revived and Restored for Merits Consideration Without Pre-deposit

20 Jan 2026

The Petitioner, a tenant in a redeveloped building, challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT, Mumbai) that required h...

High Court

Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition filed by Prime Downtown Estates Pvt Ltd. against Omkara Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. and others concerning SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petition challenges enforcement of security interest by asset reconstruction companies.

7 Apr 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Bank Recovery Proceedings — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Debt Amount as Required Under Section 21 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

9 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Sri. Srinivasa Desai, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

20 Jan 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition by Ex-Employee Challenging DRT Proceedings for Recovery of Alleged Loss Due to Misconduct. The Core Issue Is Whether Such Loss Constitutes a 'Debt' Within the Meaning of Section 2(g) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

21 Apr 2023

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011

26 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Section 21 Not Applicable at Condonation Stage. The court ruled that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 applies only at the stage of entertainment of appeal, not at the stage of considering an application for condonation of delay.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging E-Auction Sale Due to Alternate Remedy Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner, as second highest bidder, alleged collusion and system malfunction but was directed to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal.

5 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Radhika Rajesh Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)