Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition filed by Prime Downtown Estates Pvt Ltd. against Omkara Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. and others concerning SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petition challenges enforcement of security interest by asset reconstruction companies.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-07-25 22:41:19
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 4526 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 101

WPL-4526-2025

2025-04-07

2025:BHC-OS:5979

Prime Downtown Estates Pvt Ltd.

1. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd., 2. Authorized Officer, Omkara Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd., 3. JC Flowers Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., 4. Yes Bank Limited, 5. E-Commerce Magnum Solutions Ltd. (Through Resolution Professional), 6. Radius Infraholdings Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Acts & Sections

  • Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Companies Act, 2013:
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ petition asset reconstruction secured creditor financial assets Bombay High Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition filed by Prime Downtown Estates Pvt Ltd. against Omkara Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. and others concerning SARFAESI Act, 2002. The petition challenges enforcement of security interest by asset reconstr... 2026-07-25 22:41:19
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compassionate Appointment Against MSRTC Due to Unfair Labour Practice. Court Condemns MSRTC's Inhuman Treatment and Imposes Costs of Rs. 25,000 for Delaying and Denying the Claim of Deceased Employee's Son. 2026-07-25 22:41:19
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof Benefit of Doubt Limitation Circumstantial Evidence Section 482 CrPC
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?