Search Results for "Customs tariff"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Issue Exemption Notification Under Section 25 of Customs Act, 1962 — No Fundamental Right to Exemption from Customs Duty. Budget Proposal Does Not Have Force of Law Until Enacted; Power Under Section 25 is Permissive, Not Mandatory.

The petitioner, Amin Merchant, imported eight consignments of goods classified under Tariff Heading 2208.10 of the Customs Tariff during financial yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Restriction on Import of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanisms. Court Examines Whether Public Notice No. 109/89 Dated 21 March 1989 Renders Imports Under Pre-Issued Additional Licences Invalid.

The petitioners, manufacturers of colour televisions, imported Video Tape Deck Mechanism (VTDM) and Colour Picture Tubes (CPTs) against additional lic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Rejection of Settlement Applications by Customs Settlement Commission for Non-Compliance with Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962. Petitioners Argued That Non-Payment of Interest Under Repealed Section 28AB Could Not Be Ground for Rejection, and Orders Were Arbitrary.

The petitioners, a father-son duo engaged in importing old and used cranes, faced three show cause notices issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petition in Apple Watch Band Classification Dispute Under Section 28-I of Customs Act, 1962. Renewal Application for Advance Ruling Rejected Due to Pending Show Cause Notice; Petitioner Argues Pendency Must Exist on Application Date.

The litigation arose from a customs classification dispute concerning Apple Watch Bands imported by the petitioner, a company incorporated in India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...