INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2020
3 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "Confiscation Liability"
151 result(s) found
Found 151 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Under Essential Commodities Act for Non-Essential Commodities. Wheat and Rice Seized by Rationing Authorities Held Not Covered Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 or Control Orders.
8 Aug 2013The petitioners, including M/s. Ace International, Pankaj Pranjibhai Thakkar, and M/s. Metro International, filed three writ petitions challenging the...
- 94
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in GST Confiscation Case. Commercial Tax Officer Holds Proper Officer Status Under IGST Act Due to Cross Empowerment; Notification Only Required for Exceptions.
5 Mar 2025The petitioner, a proprietorship concern engaged in trading arecanut, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Without Considering Merits and Without Granting Personal Hearing Set Aside.
24 Feb 2022The petitioners, Dinesh Bhabootmal Salecha and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Settlemen...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Assessees' Appeals in Customs Duty Cases Involving Forged DEPB Scrips. Court upheld duty liability as forged scrips are void ab initio under the Customs Act, 1962, justifying extended limitation period due to fraud, with penalty proceedings remanded for adjudication.
23 Sep 2022The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals concerning customs duty evasion cases where appellants had imported goods using forged DEPB (Duty E...
- 174
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Central Excise in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Erred in Holding No Provision for Penalty Under Central Excise Act or Rules. Rule 209 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Provides for Penalty for Offences Relating to Excisable Goods.
14 Sep 2010The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal against the order dated 31st March 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...
- 39
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Reward Under Ministry of Finance Circular; No Vested Right and Pending Appeal Preclude Interim Payment. Court Holds That Clause 6.3 of the Reward Scheme Circular Requires Admission of Liability and Authority's Satisfaction of Likelihood of Success, Which Cannot Be Directed While Assessee's Service Tax Liability Is Sub Judice Before CESTAT.
26 Apr 2012The petitioner, an informer, sought a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution to compel the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence to rele...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeals in Import Dispute — Quasi-Judicial Order Under Repealed Act Not Saved. The Court held that a quasi-judicial order under the Imports (Control) Order, 1986 cannot be saved under Section 20 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 as it is repugnant to the liberalized import regime.
21 Aug 2019The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a High Court decision that quashed show cause notices issued to the respondents based on an or...
- 217
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962. Interest on Delayed Payment of Duty Held Payable Only After Crystallization of Duty Liability by Supreme Court Decision.
28 Mar 2006The petitioner, M/s. M.J. Exports Pvt. Ltd., imported 53 Haemodialysis Machines and accessories under an Open General License and claimed exemption un...
- 240
