Search Results for "Classification error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Classification error"

642 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 642 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Former Railway Employee Against Kerala State Electricity Board in Weightage Benefit Dispute — Railway Service Held to Be Central Government Service for Pensionary Weightage. Board's Own Orders and Settlements Recognizing Former Government Service for Weightage Are Binding, and Recovery from Retired Employee Without Misrepresentation Is Impermissible.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Bency John, joined the Indian Railways as a Junior Draftsman on 9th August 1990 and rendered over ten years of regular pensionable serv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Protection of Sacred Groves/Orans in Rajasthan as Deemed Forests Under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Recognizes Ecological and Cultural Significance of Community-Conserved Forests and Balances Community Rights with Conservation Goals.

18 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court of India was hearing an interlocutory application in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India writ petition, which ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds HPC Classification for Interim Bail During COVID-19 Pandemic — Reasonable Classification Permissible Under Article 14. The Court held that classification based on nature and severity of offence for interim bail during pandemic is valid and not discriminatory under Article 14 of the Constitution.

22 Sep 2020

The petitioners, National Alliance for People’s Movements and others, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against HERC Amendment Denying Tariff Adjustment to Biomass Power Plant Commissioned in FY 2013-14. The Court held that classification of projects based on financial year of commissioning within the same control period was arbitrary and discriminatory under the HERC Regulations.

2 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal by M/S Star Wire (India) Vidyut Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. against the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC) regarding th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.

30 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

31 Jul 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Binding Effect of Appellate Order Upheld. The Assistant Collector could not reclassify goods under a different tariff heading after the Collector (Appeals) had decided the classification in favor of the assessee and the Revenue had accepted that decision.

4 May 2005

The petitioners, The Rubber Products Limited and its Managing Director, were engaged in the manufacture of vacuum brake hoses used in railway wagons. ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)