COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.238 OF 2019
6 Nov 2019The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li...
Search Results for "Arbitration Award Challenge"
1513 result(s) found
Found 1513 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Interest Award Under MSMED Act. Court held that remedy under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is optional, not exclusive, and ad hoc arbitration permissible, with interest under Section 16 MSMED Act upheld.
10 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a contract for supply of VRLA batteries between Petitioner, a government enterprise, and Respondent, a company registered under...
- 344
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.
20 Apr 2021The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.
28 Jan 2026The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.
18 Apr 2016The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Feb 2013The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MSMED Act Arbitral Award on Limitation and Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that limitation for arbitration under Section 18 of MSMED Act is governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the court where the arbitration is held has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 42 of Arbitration Act.
27 Jan 2023The petitioner, Gammon Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 24 September 2020 passed by the Facilitation Council unde...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Petition for Foreign Award Citing Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Prior Section 34 Filing. Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Vests Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Court at Jamkhambalia Where the Section 34 Application Was First Filed.
20 Dec 2010The petitioners, Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd., a company incorporated in England engaged in shipping, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitration award...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Termination of Arbitral Proceedings Under ICA Maritime Rules — Rule 20 Time Limit Not Absolute; Delay-Causing Party Cannot Insist on Termination. Arbitral Tribunal's Rejection of Termination Application Upheld as Party Which Caused Delay Through Interlocutory Applications Cannot Rely on Two-Year Limit Under Rule 20(1) of the Maritime Arbitration Rules.
20 Apr 2010The case arose from a charter party executed on 6 November 2006 between Rashtriya Chemical Fertilizers Ltd., a public sector undertaking, and J.S. Oce...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
3 Apr 2014The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...
- 109
