Search Results for "Additional Tahsildar office"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Additional Tahsildar office"

860 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Upholding Mandatory Nature of Separate Notices for No-Confidence Motion against Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch. Common Notice under Rule 2(1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 Rendered Resolution Void Due to Prejudice to Office-Bearers.

27 Aug 2012

Background: The writ petitions were filed by members of Gram Panchayat of Digras (Kh) challenging the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismissed Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Sand Auction Amount Due to Prohibition on Suction Pump. Clause 11(b) and 11(c) of Government Resolution dated 12.03.2013 and NGT Order Barred Use of Suction Pump; Petitioner Made No Bona Fide Attempt Using Conventional Methods, Entitling No Further Refund Beyond Proportionate Compensation.

21 Sep 2021

The dispute concerned a writ petition filed by a sand supplier before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and it...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Revision Order — Minister's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Inordinate Delay. Mutation Entry No.508 dated 17.10.2010 Restored as Revision Under Section 257 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Was Filed After 3 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties.

10 Feb 2021

The petitioners, four brothers (Balkrishna, Gopalkrishna, Vishwanath, and Dattatraya), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2017 passed by th...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Examines Writ Petition Against Rejection of Community Certificate Under Puducherry Scheduled Caste Order. The Petitioner Claims Hindu-Adi-Dravidar Status but Authorities Cite Migration and Lack of Pre-1964 Residence Proof.

26 Mar 2025

The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the orders of the original and appellate authorities rejecting the p...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Proceedings Before Assistant Commissioner in Caste Certificate Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court Holds that Appeal Under Section 4B is Not Maintainable as Tahsildar Merely Implemented Committee Order, Thus Proceedings are Coram Non-Judice.

28 May 2024

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings before the Assistant Commissi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having Four Children — Birth Date Correction of Fourth Child Accepted, Disqualification Set Aside. The court held that the Additional Collector failed to consider the correction of the birth date of the fourth child, which would bring the child's birth before the cut-off date under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

4 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Padmakar Pandurang Kale, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Maradga, on 24/10/2010. Respondent No.1, Santosh Kale, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Orders Setting Aside No-Confidence Motions Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat. The Core Issue Involved Validity of Service of Notice and Procedural Compliance Under Bombay Village Panchayat Sarpanch and UpSarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

8 Feb 2013

The writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged concurrent orders of the Additional Collector, Parbhani and the Divisiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

24 Jan 2014

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court's Review Order in Mutation Dispute — Review Power Cannot Be Used to Rehear Merits After Dismissal of SLP. The High Court's review order was set aside as it sought to re-examine the merits after the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP against the original judgment, and the contempt petition was barred by limitation.

1 Jan 2024

The present appeals arise from a long-standing property dispute concerning land known as 'Asman Jahi Paigah' in Raidurg village. The original suit for...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus for Patta Issuance Based on Civil Court Decree — Ex Parte Decree Not Set Aside Attains Finality, Respondents Directed to Consider Representation Within Six Weeks.

24 Jan 2025

The petitioner, B. Ganesan, a senior citizen aged about 74 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)