Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004
6 Oct 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...
Search Results for "Actually paid"
3732 result(s) found
Found 3732 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.
11 Jul 2018The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Discharges Private Shipping Agents in CBI Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Case as Invoices Were Disallowed and No Loss Caused to SCI. Court Relies on Sanctioning Authority's Finding That No Wrongful Gain or Loss Occurred, and Discharge of Co-Accused Public Servants.
29 Aug 2024The petitioners, Krishna Bhagwan Kotak (partner) and M/s. J.M. Baxi & Co., were arraigned as accused in Special CBI Case No.60/2010 for alleged crimin...
- 675
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Tax Dispute — Water Benefit Tax Held Leviable Despite Disconnection of Water Supply. Premises Connected by Communication Pipes with Municipal Water Works Attract Property Tax Under Section 141 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Irrespective of Actual Water Consumption.
22 Oct 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which had qua...
- 343
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.
14 Sep 2021The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.
13 Mar 2018The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Failed Trap and Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as initial demand was not corroborated and trap did not succeed.
19 Jan 2016The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, clerks at Pune Municipal Cor...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.
7 Sep 2012The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Concluded Contract. Document lacking vendor's signature and containing incomplete terms cannot be enforced under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
18 Dec 2023The appellants (original defendants) challenged the trial court's decree for specific performance of an alleged agreement to sell dated 1st October 20...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Cases — Holds That Arm's Length Price Determination Must Be Based on Reliable Comparable Data and Functional Analysis. The Tribunal's deletion of adjustments was upheld as it correctly applied functional comparability and permissible adjustments under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
5 Dec 2014The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax...
- 119
