Search Results for "maximum rate"

1271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Damages Levy for Delayed PF Contributions Due to Financial Hardship and Change of Management. Employer's Delay from 1973 to 1987 Condoned as No Mens Rea Established and Subsequent Compliance Shown.

The petitioner, M/s. Sangam Press Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC), Pune, imposing damages for delaye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Computation Dispute Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court's Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction to Determine Entitlement to Higher Gratuity Rate.

The case involves a dispute over gratuity computation between Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceuticals Corporation Ltd. (the petitioner) and its retired employee,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...