Search Results for "international commercial dispute"

1283 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1283 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner's Application for Appointment of Retired District Judge as Sole Arbitrator Granted Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Notice.

The petitioner, M/s Bafna Udyog, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010218752018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines High Court's Dismissal of Objections Under Section 47 CPC in Enforcement of Arbitral Award. Appeal Arises from Long-Term Coal Supply Agreement Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations and Scope of Section 47.

The dispute arose from a Long Term Agreement dated 07.03.2007 between MMTC Limited (appellant) and Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Limited (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...