High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Appoints Former Judge as Arbitrator for Disputes Arising from Joint Development Agreement Dated 27.06.2016 After Finding Existence of Arbitration Agreement and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Lubna Shah, represented by her GPA holder Mr. Abubaker Siddique, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dated 27.06.2016 entered into with the respondents, B.M. Jayeshankar, B.M. Karunesh, and M/S Varin Infra Project Pvt. Ltd. The JDA contained an arbitration clause (Clause 22.3.06) providing for resolution of disputes through arbitration. The petitioner contended that disputes arose between the parties and that despite issuing a notice invoking the arbitration clause, the respondents failed to appoint an arbitrator, necessitating the court's intervention. The respondents, represented by Sri. Rakshith Pai, did not oppose the appointment but raised certain objections regarding the scope of disputes. The court, after hearing both sides, examined the existence of the arbitration agreement and the failure of the respondents to appoint an arbitrator. The court held that the conditions under Section 11(6) were satisfied and allowed the petition, appointing Retired Justice Ashok Hinchegeri as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes in accordance with the arbitration clause. The court directed the arbitrator to enter upon reference and complete the proceedings expeditiously, subject to the arbitrator's consent and disclosure requirements under the Act.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Petitioner sought appointment of sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Act for disputes arising from a Joint Development Agreement dated 27.06.2016 containing arbitration clause 22.3.06. Court found that the arbitration agreement existed and respondents failed to appoint arbitrator despite notice. Held that the petition is allowed and a former judge is appointed as sole arbitrator (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, given the existence of an arbitration clause in the Joint Development Agreement dated 27.06.2016 and the failure of the respondents to appoint an arbitrator.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Retired Justice Ashok Hinchegeri appointed as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes under Clause 22.3.06 of JDA dated 27.06.2016.

Law Points

  • Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Appointment of arbitrator by court
  • Existence of arbitration agreement
  • Failure of party to appoint arbitrator
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (11) 26

CMP No. 155 of 2025

2025-11-14

Suraj Govindaraj

Samarth Shreedhar for petitioner, Rakshith Pai for respondents

Mrs. Lubna Shah

B. M. Jayeshankar, B.M Karunesh, M/S Varin Infra Project Pvt. Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of sole arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes under the Joint Development Agreement dated 27.06.2016.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between parties under the JDA; respondents failed to appoint arbitrator despite notice invoking arbitration clause.

Issues

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that arbitration agreement exists and respondents failed to appoint arbitrator. Respondents did not oppose appointment but raised objections regarding scope of disputes.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement, the court may appoint an arbitrator. The existence of an arbitration clause and failure to appoint arbitrator justifies court intervention.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. Appoint retd. Justice Ashok Hinchegeri or such other person as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, as the sole Arbitrator under Sec. 11(6) of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for resolving the disputes as per clause 22.3 06 of arising under the JDA dated 27.06.2016.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed CMP under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition came up for admission and was disposed of by oral order on 14.11.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Appoints Former Judge as Arbitrator for Disputes Arising from Joint Development Agreement Dated ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Restoration of MD Seat in Medical Education Admission Dispute. Petitioner's seat cancelled due to non-joining within stipulated time; court upholds cancellation as per counseling rules and finds no v...