WRIT PETITION NO. 2989 OF 2025
30 May 2025The petitioner, Hemang Jadavji Shah, a 50-year-old businessman currently lodged in Arthur Road Jail, filed Writ Petition No. 2989 of 2025 before the H...
Search Results for "distributed"
1062 result(s) found
Found 1062 result(s)
High Court
- 17
High Court
- 31
High Court
- 47
High Court
- 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Case — Receipt for Construction of Cinema House Not Advance Rent. Lease Lacked Stipulation for Adjustment of Payment Toward Rent; Premium Prima Facie Capital Not Taxable Under Income Tax Act.
30 Jan 1969The case involves an assessee who, on July 19, 1945, took a lease of certain premises in Calcutta on monthly rent. He made alterations to convert the ...
- 93
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bonus Calculation Dispute Involving Subsidiary Company. Service Fee Payment Under Technical Aid Agreement Held to Be Legitimate Expenditure, and Deduction of Bonus as Prior Charge Before Depreciation and Tax Ruled Improper Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
6 May 1959The dispute arose out of a claim for bonus by the workmen of Crompton Parkinson (Works) Private Ltd., Bombay, which was initially a wholly-owned subsi...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
20 Mar 1959The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...
- 64
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Tax Treatment of Compensation for Partial Termination of Selling Agency under Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court considered whether the sum received by the assessee for termination of agency rights outside Hyderabad State constituted a capital receipt or revenue receipt.
20 Mar 1959Background: The case involved the income tax assessment of the respondent, a registered firm carrying on business as selling agents and distributors o...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Bidi Factory Manager Under Factories Act, 1948 Due to Lack of Employer Control Over Workers. Sattedars and Their Coolies Held Not to Be 'Workers' Under Section 2(1) as Factory Management Lacked Control and Supervision Over Manner of Work.
18 Feb 1958The appellants were the manager of a bidi factory operating under contracts with Sattedars, independent contractors who agreed to supply bidis manufac...
- 170
