Search Results for "disciplinary proceedings pending"

1184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.

The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act. Petitioner, a retired Superintendent, was charged under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without prior sanction from competent authority, rendering proceedings invalid.

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Nandaraju, a retired Superintendent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 14 Petitions to Terminate Arbitrator Mandate Due to Deemed Waiver of Right to Object. Arbitrator appointed by Co-operative Bank under MSCS Act failed to disclose interest and continued proceedings despite jurisdictional challenge, leading to termination of mandate.

The petitioners, Kalpesh Shantikumar Mehta and others, along with KSM Multitrade LLP and others, filed two petitions under Section 14 of the Arbitrati...