Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where lower appellate court's finding that property is joint family property is based on evidence.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Ranebennu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Stay Suit Pending Rectification. Civil Court Has Concurrent Jurisdiction to Decide Infringement and Validity of Trademark Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries and M/s. Sri Laxmi Vinayaka Rice Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kishor N, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court IV, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.7848/2018 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Discharge in Corruption Case — No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988 and Sections 471/477A/120-B IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Susanta Kumar Dalei against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had dismissed his discharge ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellant failed to prove exclusive title and that the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The case involves a property dispute over Gut No. 152, Old Survey No. 76, admeasuring 5H 36R (13 acres) at Village Pimpri, Taluka Khurd, District Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The case pertains to a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 20.07...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Half Share in Joint Family Properties Dismissed as Appellant Failed to Prove Substantial Question of Law.

The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her half share in the suit schedule properties against the appellant-de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence and no grounds for interference under revisional jurisdiction.

The case involves three criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners against their conviction under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact regarding dishonest inducement and delivery of property in land sale transaction not interfered with.

The case involves three criminal revision petitions filed by the accused persons against their conviction under Section 420 read with Section 34 of th...