Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Vague In-Camera Statements — Failure to Furnish Date, Time, and Place of Incidents Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation. The Court held that withholding details of incidents beyond witness identity renders statements vague and infringes Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
28 Oct 2013The petitioner, Satish Shivcharan Samudre, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleg...




