Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking CBI Investigation in Murder Case Due to Lack of Exceptional Circumstances. Court holds that mere allegations of inadequate investigation do not warrant transfer of investigation to CBI or constitution of SIT under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Hardik Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking transfer of investigation of FIR No. 0872/2024, registered on 23rd October 2024 at Shivajinagar Police Station, Ambernath, Thane, to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or, in the alternative, constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT). The FIR was lodged for the murder of the petitioner's father, Sanjay Shriram Patil. The petitioner alleged that the investigation by the state police was not proper and that all persons involved in the murder and conspiracy were not made accused. He contended that important facts pointing to the guilt of certain named individuals were ignored. The court heard arguments from Mr. Yash Dewal for the petitioner and Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the State. After perusing the record, the court dismissed the petition, holding that transfer of investigation to CBI is an extraordinary power to be exercised only in exceptional circumstances, such as when the investigation is biased, or the case has interstate or international ramifications. The court found no such exceptional circumstances in this case. It noted that the investigation was ongoing and the petitioner could approach the trial court if dissatisfied. The court also declined to constitute an SIT, observing that the power to do so is also extraordinary and should not be ordered lightly. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Investigation to CBI - Exceptional Circumstances - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought transfer of investigation of a murder case to CBI or constitution of SIT alleging inadequate investigation and failure to arraign all conspirators. The court held that transfer to CBI is an extraordinary power to be exercised only in exceptional circumstances, and mere allegations of inadequate investigation do not warrant such transfer. The court found no material to show that the state police investigation was biased or that the case involved interstate or international ramifications requiring CBI investigation. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Procedure - Constitution of Special Investigation Team (SIT) - Grounds for - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court held that the power to constitute SIT is also an extraordinary measure and should not be ordered lightly. The petitioner failed to demonstrate any specific failure or bias on the part of the investigating agency. The court observed that the investigation was ongoing and the petitioner could approach the trial court for appropriate relief if dissatisfied. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the investigation of FIR No. 0872/2024 should be transferred to the CBI or a Special Investigation Team (SIT) be constituted on the ground of inadequate investigation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of investigation to CBI requires exceptional circumstances
  • mere inadequacy of investigation not sufficient
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • power of High Court to order CBI investigation
  • scope of judicial review in criminal investigations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:57397-DB

Criminal Writ Petition (ST) No. 3653 of 2025

2025-12-22

A.S. Gadkari, Ranjit Singh Rajabhoj Bonsale

2025:BHC-AS:57397-DB

Mr. Yash Dewal for Petitioner, Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 - State

Hardik Patil

The State of Maharashtra, Suraj Vilas Patil, Harsh Sunil Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investigation to CBI or constitution of SIT.

Remedy Sought

Direction to transfer investigation of FIR No. 0872/2024 to CBI or constitute SIT.

Filing Reason

Alleged inadequate investigation into murder of petitioner's father.

Issues

Whether the investigation should be transferred to CBI? Whether a Special Investigation Team should be constituted?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that investigation was not proper and all conspirators were not made accused. State opposed the petition, submitting that investigation was ongoing and no exceptional circumstances existed.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of investigation to CBI or constitution of SIT is an extraordinary power to be exercised only in exceptional circumstances, such as bias or interstate/international ramifications. Mere allegations of inadequate investigation do not warrant such orders.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks a direction to transfer the investigation of F.I.R. No. 0872/2024... to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Heard Mr. Yash Deval for the Petitioner, Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P for Respondent No.1-State. Perused the record.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking transfer of investigation of FIR No. 0872/2024 to CBI or constitution of SIT. The court heard the parties and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking CBI Investigation in Murder Case Due to Lack of Exceptional Circumstances. Court holds that mere allegations of inadequate investigation do not warrant transfer of investigation to CBI or constitution of S...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Li...