CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Income Tax Officers"
932 result(s) found
Found 932 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Revenue Circle Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Independent Panch Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
18 Jan 2024The appellant, Rajaram Banderao Kulkarni, was a Revenue Circle Officer at Pangari, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur. On 24 May 1994, the complainant (P...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Petition for Ex-Gratia Compensation for Covid-19 Death of Hand Pump Helper. Court holds that death due to Covid-19 infection, without proof of direct causal link to duty, does not entitle compensation under Government Resolutions for Covid Warriors.
28 Mar 2024The petitioner, Kanchan w/o Sunilappa Hamshette, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking ex-gratia compensation of Rs...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Retired Head Master's Petition for Pension and Benefits Despite Post-Retirement Disciplinary Inquiry. Disciplinary Inquiry Initiated After Superannuation Without Statutory Authority is Invalid and Pension Cannot Be Withheld.
15 Mar 2024The petitioner, Ashok Ramrao Kadam, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 9 August 1984 and later promoted as Head Master. He served until his supe...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Retrenchment of School Employee Falls Under MRTU & PULP Act, Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction. The court held that termination without following Section 5 of MEPS Act constitutes retrenchment under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, exclusively triable by Industrial Court.
13 Feb 2023The petitioner, Neena B. Rangnekar, was employed as a Junior Clerk with respondent no.1 Trust from 1 February 1989 and later promoted to Senior Clerk....
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
3 Oct 2023The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.
12 Jan 2022The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule 35 of Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Rules, 2018 for Lack of Cause of Action and Failure to Make Demand for Justice. Rule requiring display of name boards in Marathi is held to be intra vires the Constitution and not violative of fundamental rights.
23 Feb 2022The petition was filed by the Federation of Retail Traders Welfare Association and an individual challenging Rule 35 of the Maharashtra Shops and Esta...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Co-operative Society Membership Dispute — Holds That Registrar Has No Jurisdiction to Decide Validity of Membership Admission Under Section 22 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and Such Disputes Must Be Adjudicated by the Co-operative Court Under Section 91.
17 Nov 2022The petitioners, Prerana Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. through its Chairman and CEO, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10.11.2021 passed by...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compassionate Appointment Against MSRTC Due to Unfair Labour Practice. Court Condemns MSRTC's Inhuman Treatment and Imposes Costs of Rs. 25,000 for Delaying and Denying the Claim of Deceased Employee's Son.
13 Feb 2020The petitioner, Mahesh Bahad, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) seeking compassionate appointment after the death of h...
- 71
