Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Petition for Ex-Gratia Compensation for Covid-19 Death of Hand Pump Helper. Court holds that death due to Covid-19 infection, without proof of direct causal link to duty, does not entitle compensation under Government Resolutions for Covid Warriors.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kanchan w/o Sunilappa Hamshette, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking ex-gratia compensation of Rs. 50 lakhs from the State of Maharashtra for the death of her husband, Sunilappa Hamshette, who worked as a Hand Pump Helper. She claimed that her husband was deployed during the Covid-19 pandemic, performed essential services, and should be considered a Covid Warrior. Her husband died on 29.04.2021 due to Covid-19 infection. The petitioner challenged the communication dated 06.11.2023 issued by respondent No. 2 (Secretary, Rural Development Department) rejecting the proposal for ex-gratia compensation. The court examined the grounds raised in the petition, including that the husband was on duty before 14 days of infection and died during the course of employment. However, the court found that the petitioner failed to establish a direct causal link between the husband's duty and the Covid-19 infection. The medical report did not specify that the infection was contracted due to work. The court noted that the Government Resolutions for ex-gratia compensation to Covid Warriors require proof that the death was directly attributable to Covid-19 duty. Since the petitioner could not provide such evidence, the court dismissed the petition, upholding the rejection of the compensation proposal. The court held that mere deployment during the pandemic does not automatically entitle compensation.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Ex-Gratia Compensation - Covid-19 Death - Entitlement - The petitioner sought ex-gratia compensation of Rs. 50 lakhs for the death of her husband, a Hand Pump Helper, who died due to Covid-19 on 29.04.2021. The court held that mere deployment during the pandemic does not automatically entitle compensation; there must be a direct causal link between the duty and the infection. The Government Resolutions for Covid Warriors require proof that the death was directly attributable to Covid-19 duty. (Paras 1-5)

B) Evidence - Burden of Proof - Causal Link - The petitioner failed to establish that her husband contracted Covid-19 due to his work as a Hand Pump Helper. The medical report did not specify the source of infection. The court held that the burden lies on the claimant to show a nexus between the duty and the infection. (Paras 3-5)

C) Government Policy - Interpretation - Covid Warriors - The Government Resolutions providing ex-gratia compensation are meant for frontline workers directly involved in Covid-19 management. A Hand Pump Helper, though providing essential water supply, is not a Covid Warrior unless specifically notified. The court upheld the rejection of the proposal by the respondent. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner-widow is entitled to ex-gratia compensation of Rs. 50 lakhs for the death of her husband, a Hand Pump Helper, who died due to Covid-19, on the ground that he was a Covid Warrior deployed in essential services.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The impugned communication dated 06.11.2023 is upheld. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Ex-gratia compensation
  • Covid-19 death
  • essential services
  • causal link
  • burden of proof
  • Government Resolution interpretation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (03) 8

WRIT PETITION NO. 952 OF 2024

2024-03-28

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, R.M. JOSHI

2024:BHC-AUG:7748-DB

Mr.S.N. Janakwade for Petitioner, Mr.R.S. Wani AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5

Kanchan w/o Sunilappa Hamshette

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Finance Department; The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Rural Development Department; The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nanded; The Executive Engineer, Gram Panchayat Water Supply Department, Zilla Parishad, Nanded; The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Degloor

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking ex-gratia compensation for death due to Covid-19.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of communication dated 06.11.2023 rejecting compensation proposal, and grant of Rs. 50 lakhs ex-gratia with interest.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's husband, a Hand Pump Helper, died due to Covid-19 on 29.04.2021; she claimed he was a Covid Warrior deployed in essential services.

Previous Decisions

Respondent No. 2 rejected the proposal for ex-gratia compensation via communication dated 06.11.2023.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to ex-gratia compensation of Rs. 50 lakhs for the death of her husband due to Covid-19. Whether the husband can be considered a Covid Warrior entitled to compensation under Government Resolutions.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her husband was on duty before 14 days of infection, died during course of employment, and was providing essential water supply services during pandemic. Respondents argued that there is no direct causal link between duty and infection, and the husband does not qualify as a Covid Warrior under Government Resolutions.

Ratio Decidendi

Ex-gratia compensation for Covid-19 death requires proof of direct causal link between duty and infection. Mere deployment during pandemic does not entitle compensation. The burden of proof lies on the claimant.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a case wherein the Petitioner-widow seeks ex-gratia compensation of Rs.50 lakhs from the Government on the ground that (a) her husband was deployed during the Covid-19 on duty, (b) her husband was performing work which fell in essential services and (c) her husband can be called as a Covid Warrior. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has extensively canvassed in the light of the 12 grounds formulated in the memo of the Petition.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 952 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging the communication dated 06.11.2023 rejecting her proposal for ex-gratia compensation. The court heard the matter on 28.03.2024 and dismissed the petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Review Before Fees Regulating Authority Under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2015. The Court directed the authority to consider the review application on ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the ingredients of Section 304B IPC and Sec...