INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025
9 Oct 2025...
Search Results for "third party purchaser"
1248 result(s) found
Found 1248 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Borrowers' Right to Hearing in RBI Fraud Classification Directions. The Court held that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, must be read into the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 to prevent arbitrariness, as classification entails serious civil consequences under Clauses 8.9.4 and 8.9.5.
27 Mar 2023The civil appeals arose from challenges to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directio...
- 328
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the Reference Court and First Appellate Court had correctly assessed market value based on evidence, and the claimant failed to demonstrate any error warranting interference under Section 54(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
23 Nov 2024The appellant, Smt. Gangabayamma, was the absolute owner of land bearing Survey No.47/1A2, measuring 20 guntas, with standing trees, situated at C.Nan...
- 214
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the Reference Court and First Appellate Court had correctly assessed market value based on evidence and that the claimant failed to demonstrate any error warranting interference under Section 54(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
23 Nov 2024The appellant, Smt. Gangabayamma, was the absolute owner of land bearing Survey No.47/1A2, measuring 20 guntas, with standing trees, situated at C.Nan...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Restitution Plea in Testamentary Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Consent Terms Discharge Court Receiver Without Court Order; Applicants Seek Possession Restored.
8 Jul 2005The dispute arose from the estate of Shalini Devi Ghatge, who died on 12.08.1982 leaving two wills. One will dated 06.01.1982 was propounded by the ex...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Claim for Raising Attachment in Execution Proceedings — Registered Transfer of Property Must Be Adjudicated on Merits. The Court held that the Executing Court cannot summarily reject a claim based on a registered deed of transfer without proper inquiry under Order 21 Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
13 Jun 2013The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 18 June 2012 dismissing a Chamber Summons taken out by the Appellant for raising an ...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.
8 Apr 2011The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Recovery Certificate and Auction Sale — Upholds Validity of Sale Certificate Issued Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the sale certificate under Section 99 is conclusive evidence of title and the recovery certificate under Section 101 is final and binding, barring writ jurisdiction.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Sangli Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed three writ petit...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Article 227. Court upholds concurrent findings of fact by arbitrator and appellate tribunal regarding validity of agreements and possession.
7 Nov 2025The judgment arises from three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award and the appellate ord...
- 104
High Court
Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.
31 Jan 2019The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...
- 121
