Search Results for "averment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "averment"

2142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2142 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from Reservation for Primary School Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 — Landowner's Withdrawal of Consent for TDR Valid Due to Acquiring Body's Delay. The court held that the land reserved for a primary school stood released from reservation as the acquiring body failed to acquire the land within the statutory period, and the landowner's withdrawal of consent for TDR was valid due to the acquiring body's delay.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gut No. 114 in Village Pimprala, Jalgaon, within the municipal limits of Jalgaon Municipal Corporation, sought...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Family Property Dispute Due to Civil Nature and Malicious Prosecution. The court held that the dispute is purely civil and the FIR was a counterblast, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

1 Apr 2024

The applicant, Amol Bhaskar Sulakhe, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.291 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Bus Driver — Act of God Defence Rejected. Tribunal's finding of no negligence reversed; bus driver held negligent for sudden lane change causing accident.

4 Apr 2024

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim filed by Rajesh Shantilal Sejpal (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) under Section 173 of the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Sales Executive Challenging Termination — Holds He Is Not an 'Employee' Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court affirmed that the petitioner's supervisory and managerial role excluded him from the definition of employee under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

26 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Jobi Joseph, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1 April 2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

16 Apr 2024

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Reason to Believe. Notice Issued Beyond Four-Year Limit Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts Held Invalid.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in government contracts for water supply schemes, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Unsigned Notice Invalid and Proceedings Barred by Limitation. The court held that an unsigned notice under Section 148 is not a valid notice and cannot initiate reassessment proceedings beyond the limitation period under Section 149(1)(b).

9 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Prakash Krishnavtar Bhardwaj, a non-resident Indian residing in Dubai, UAE, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Non-Compliance with Time Limit and Approval Requirement under Income Tax Act, 1961. The order under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 for AY 2018-19 were invalid as they were passed after three years from the end of the assessment year without approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner.

15 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Chitra Supekar, a housewife, challenged the notice dated 20th March 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Technology Development Dispute — Dispute Regarding Termination of Agreement and Refusal to Issue Work Order Referred to Arbitration. The court held that a valid arbitration agreement existed and the dispute was arbitrable, appointing a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Sara Chemicals and Consultants, a proprietary concern engaged in organic chemical development, entered into a Technology Development S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

27 Feb 2023

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

86 87 88 89 90

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)