Search Results for "Court Award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Court Award"

10086 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10086 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

13 Feb 2006

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.

16 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Husband from Pursuing Divorce Case in Dubai; Examines Principles of Comity, Forum Conveniens, and Multiplicity of Proceedings Under CPC and Specific Relief Act. The family court’s order ignoring the habitual residence of the wife and child in a foreign jurisdiction was under scrutiny for failing to apply the principles of comity and forum conveniens.

29 Apr 2013

The dispute arose out of a matrimonial conflict between husband and wife, both Indian nationals, who were married in India and last resided together i...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

13 Sep 2019

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 36% to 24% per annum. Court holds that 36% per annum interest on delayed payments is penal and excessive, and reduces it to 24% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Ashwin Crane & Construction and Ashwin Virji Dhame, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, even if possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases. Court upholds enhanced compensation based on market value and potential use under National Highways Act, 1956.

30 Nov -0001

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed four arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

86 87 88 89 90

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)