Search Results for "section 23(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "section 23(3)"

897 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 897 result(s)

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Fresh Form G to Maximize Asset Value in CIRP of Raigarh Champa Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. — Challenge Mechanism Under Regulation 39(1A)(b) of IBBI Regulations, 2016 Must Be Conducted Among Existing Resolution Applicants.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., acting as trustee of Rail December 2024 Trust, challenging the Impugned Order ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration of Mutation Entry Challenge. Single Judge's Direction to Revenue Authorities to Take Steps Without Hearing Appellants Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

20 Jul 2023

The present intra-Court appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenges the order dated 07.02.2022 passed by the learned Sing...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Buyer's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reversing High Court's Decision on Readiness and Willingness. The Court held that the buyer's evidence, including plaint averments, deposition, and deposit of balance consideration, sufficiently established readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the High Court erred in interfering with the Trial Court's findings.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 13.03.2007, where the seller agreed to sell land to the buyer for Rs. 12,74,000, with Rs. 3 lakhs pa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

29 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Finding That Properties Were Self-Acquired by Sons, Not Benami. Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 Held Retroactive, Barring Claim Based on Benami Nature.

9 Apr 2019

The present appeal arises from a partition suit filed by Smt. P. Leelavathi (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against her brothers, the ori...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the appellants failed to prove title and possession over the suit property, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration.

7 Feb 2024

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, which affirm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Held that reservation for garden does not automatically lapse upon non-development within 10 years; however, failure to acquire land within reasonable time renders reservation invalid and owner entitled to compensation or release.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioners, Runwal Township Pvt. Ltd. and its director Kishorkumar Jain, owned land in Mumbai that was reserved for a garden in the Development P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Work Order in Tender Dispute — Additional Performance Security Furnished Within Time. Court holds that submission of additional performance security on the third working day was within the prescribed period of two working days as per Clause 2.22.0, and minor discrepancies in documents did not warrant disqualification.

25 Mar 2022

The petitioner, M/s. V.N.Reddy, a government contractor, challenged the issuance of a work order dated 07.05.2021 by the Executive Engineer, Lower War...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging IPAB Order Refusing Additional Evidence in Trademark Opposition. Court holds that the IPAB's refusal to allow additional documents was not perverse or arbitrary, and the petitioners failed to show sufficient cause for not producing them earlier.

29 Apr 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Agar Distributors (India) and Shri Siraj Amirali Soorani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 July 2010 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Orders for Smuggling of Red Sanders/Sandalwood — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider possibility of prosecution under Customs Act and failed to apply mind to relevant material.

24 Jul 2013

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus writ petitions challenging detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of the Co...

85 86 87 88 89

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)