Search Results for "additional district judge"

10253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistencies in Evidence. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 506 Part-I IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nagesh s/o Samayya Made, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Special (POCSO) Case No.21/2016 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Claim Under Section 125 CrPC, Restoring Magistrate's Order of Rs. 3000 Per Month. Sessions Court's Reduction Set Aside as Unjustified Given Husband's Income and Assets.

The petitioner, Anita Dashrath Dolare, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, dated 09.04.2018, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Case from Bagalkot to Jewergi Under Section 24 CPC — Husband's Convenience and Child's Welfare Considered. The court held that the balance of convenience favored transfer to the husband's place of residence, Jewergi, to avoid undue hardship.

The petitioner, Shivangouda, filed a civil petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of M.C.No.8/2019 pending b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sambhaji Pachare, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Shal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. First Appellate Court Exceeded Its Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Suit Without Satisfying Conditions for Remand.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership, possession, and permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property. T...