Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1406 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1406 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Vithoba Gangode, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for the murder of his wife Shali under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Daughter's Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vishwas Pitambar Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case No. 105 of 2017 for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 452 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sachin s/o Vaijinath Tandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, for offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 326, 324 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Unlawful Assembly and Overt Acts Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by seven appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Conviction in Drug Trafficking Case Under NDPS Act. Appellant's Voluntary Statement Under Section 67 and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Primary Bases for Trial Court's Verdict.

The High Court of Bombay heard Criminal Appeal No.783 of 2000 against the judgment of the Special Judge, NDPS, Mumbai, dated October 11, 2000, in NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Conviction of Trap Witness Under Section 344 CrPC for Alleged False Evidence in Corruption Case. Court Analyzed Whether Contradictory Statements During Cross-Examination Constituted Wilful Perjury as Defined Under Section 191 IPC.

The appellant was a panch witness in a corruption case tried by the Special Judge, Akola. The original case involved allegations that a Junior Enginee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Manish Gharat, an autorickshaw driver, who was allegedly killed by the appellants due to a love affair between the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Rejection of Application to Reject Approver's Vakalatnama and Transfer Her to Another Jail. Approver's Right to Engage Counsel of Her Choice Upheld Under Section 303 CrPC and Article 22(1) of the Constitution.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Washim, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur ...