Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"
1056 result(s) found
Found 1056 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.
14 Aug 2018The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Society's Right to Develop Land in Siddharth Nagar, Rejects MHADA's Claim of Ownership. The court held that the cooperative society representing occupants of Patra chawls is entitled to development rights over 10 acres of land as per government resolution, and MHADA cannot unilaterally terminate the development agreement.
10 Feb 2011The case involves a dispute over the development of land in Siddharth Nagar, Goregaon, Mumbai. The Bombay Housing and Area Development Board (now MHAD...
- 104
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes SARFAESI Proceedings Against Company Under CIRP — Resolution Professional Entitled to Possession of Assets. Held that Section 14 of IBC overrides SARFAESI Act and other laws, and the moratorium under IBC bars any proceedings against the corporate debtor's assets.
24 May 2021The petitioner, M/s. Dreams Infra India Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Resolution Professional Sri Ashok Kriplani appointed by the National Company Law...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Ex-Parte SRA Order Deleting Slum Dweller's Name and Upholds Right to Permanent Alternate Accommodation. Court Held That Supplementary Annexure II Issued Without Hearing Was Invalid, and Petitioner is Entitled to Independent Rehab Tenement Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.
24 Jul 2012The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Hushna Bano Mohamed Shakir Shaikh challenging an ex-parte order dated 9 ...
- 16
Tribunals
NCLAT Allows Appeal by Successful Resolution Applicant Against EPFO Claim for Pre-CIRP Dues, Holding That Resolution Plan Approved Under IBC Is Binding on All Stakeholders Including Statutory Authorities. The tribunal ruled that EPFO's failure to file claim during CIRP results in extinguishment of dues, and the corporate debtor gets a clean slate post-resolution.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two appeals arising from an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, dated 03.07.2024, which allowed an appl...
- 178
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
29 Sep 2023The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from ULC Proceedings Due to Abatement Under Repeal Act — Land Held to Be Bhoomiswami, Not Nazul Lease, Entitling Petitioners to Restoration of Possession and Mutation.
30 Apr 2019The petitioners, Smt. Parvatibai wd/o Dashrath Behar and Narayan s/o Late Shri Dashrath Behar, filed a writ petition seeking release of land admeasuri...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Vice-Chairman of APMC Challenging Removal Under Section 45(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Show Cause Notice and Removal Order Quashed for Being Vague and Non-Speaking, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.
9 Apr 2019The petitioner, an elected Director and Vice-Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Dhamangaon Railway, challenged an order date...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Developer. Appointment of Arbitrator Without Mutual Consent Held Invalid Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
5 Nov 2014The petitioners, a proposed cooperative housing society and its members, entered into a development agreement with the respondent, a developer, for re...
- 99
