Search Results for "open delivery"

1828 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1828 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Clubbing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Project Dispute to Prevent Multiplicity of Proceedings. Court directs transfer of all FIRs to EOW Delhi for consolidated investigation under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

The petitioners, former directors of M/s Krrish Realtech Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking clubbing or tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree-Holder's Execution Against Pendente Lite Purchaser in Possession Suit. Held that a purchaser pendente lite is bound by the decree and can be dispossessed in execution under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC without a separate suit.

The petitioner, Kashinath Ramji Shinde (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a suit in 1987 seeking possession, declaration, and mesne p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order in Partition Suit Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Order XX Rule 18 CPC. Decree Not Drawn in Terms of Compromise, Execution Petition Held Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in a partition suit (O.S.No.114/1990), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Penalty on Directors in Central Excise Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Evidence of Personal Involvement Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...