RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "deed interpretation"
1613 result(s) found
Found 1613 result(s)
High Court
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Invocation of Bank Guarantee in Airport Development Contract Dispute. Court holds that bank guarantee is an independent contract and can be invoked only in case of breach, but no prima facie case of fraud or irretrievable injustice established.
29 Nov 2012The petitioner, Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited (HDIL), filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Spouse of Heir Seeking to Participate in Licitation in Inventory Proceedings. The right to bid in licitation under Article 1412 of Portuguese Civil Procedure Code, 1939 is limited to heirs and the moiety holder spouse, not extending to spouses of heirs.
13 Apr 2006The case involves an appeal from an order dated 01.02.2006 in Inventory Proceedings No.310/2004/B for partitioning the estate of Andre Andrade. The wi...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 208
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition to Quash SARFAESI Act Notices and Orders Against Guarantors Due to Lack of Proper Service and Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) Requirements. The court held that proper service of notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act is mandatory before taking possession under Section 13(4), and failure to prove service renders the entire action invalid.
17 Mar 2016The petitioners, Shivabassappa I. Kankanwadi and his wife Sushila S. Kankanwadi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Suit Not Barred by Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.
31 Jan 2026The case involves an interim application filed by the defendants in a commercial suit for specific performance. The plaintiff, Rajdhani Textiles Pvt. ...
- 151
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order and Notice Under Section 148A(d) and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. Reassessment Initiated Based on Information from Investigation Wing Without Independent Satisfaction by Assessing Officer.
24 May 2023The petitioner, Mr. Sanath Kumar Murali, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 25 Arbitration Invoked. The court appointed a former Judge of this Court as the sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes between the parties under the Joint Development Agreement dated 30.03.2009.
27 Aug 2018The petitioner, M/s Township Promoters, a registered partnership firm, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Disqualification of Councillor Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act. Dispute Centres on Interpretation of Section 44(1)(e) on Whether Pre-Election Unauthorized Construction by Spouse Can Lead to Disqualification.
31 Jul 2018The petitioner, a councillor of Mangaon Nagar Parishad, faced disqualification proceedings initiated by respondent No.4 under Section 44(1)(e) of the ...
- 71
