KAHC020110942015_1
13 Dec 2023...
Search Results for "decree transfer"
2834 result(s) found
Found 2834 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Guarantor's Writ Petition in Execution Proceedings — Res Judicata Bars Raising New Defenses in Execution. Guarantor Cannot Resist Decree on Grounds Not Raised in Suit Under Section 47 CPC.
26 Aug 2014The petitioner, Sri M.C. Ponnappa, was a guarantor for a loan of Rs. 8 lakh taken by the second respondent from the first respondent, State Bank of My...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Held That Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree Is Not Appealable Under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Invoked When Alternative Remedy of Revision Under Section 115 CPC Is Available.
3 Apr 2013The petitioners, Nagananda and K.R. Hanumantha Raju, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.
17 Oct 2018These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Plaintiff Entitled to Vacant Possession as Licensee's Possession Becomes Unlawful After Transfer. The court held that the defendants, who were originally licensees of the previous owner, cannot deny the title of the plaintiff-transferee and must deliver possession.
13 Jul 2010The appellant, Smt. Sarita Gopalkumar Chand, filed a suit for ejectment and vacant possession of suit plot No.253 in CRS III Scheme, NIT Middle Precin...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.
14 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...
- 333
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Restores Rejection of Plaint in Suit Based on Unregistered Agreement. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Agreement Not Produced and Suit Time-Barred Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.
17 Feb 2024The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ajmera Enterprises (the applicant) against an order of the appellate court which had set aside...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition in Rent Default and Subletting Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Article 227. Consent Decree Rent Treated as Standard Rent; Subletting Proved by Documentary Evidence.
18 Sep 2019The petitioner, a partnership firm, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondents. The building was demolished and reconstructed, and the tenant...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Revokes Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Land Situated Outside Jurisdiction. The court held that a suit seeking declaration of invalidity of a sale deed in respect of immovable property situated outside the court's jurisdiction is a suit for land, and leave granted under Clause XII of the Letters Patent must be revoked.
6 Jan 2015The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 2 February 1990 executed by Dr. Ceasar M. Fernandes and others in r...
- 118
High Court
High Court Dismisses Stranger's Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree Execution Due to Lack of Legal Right and Suppression of Facts. Objection Based on Oral Assurance from Tenant Fails as No Documentary Evidence Produced Under Hyderabad Rent Control Act, 1954, and Execution Proceedings Must Proceed as Per Decree.
30 Mar 2026The dispute arose from the execution of an eviction decree ordered by the High Court in 2011, originating from eviction proceedings initiated in 1992 ...
- 466
