Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1893 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1893 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Affair Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory coupled with motive and recovery of weapon established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Satish Ramchandra Bavbande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of Neeta, a 16-year-old girl, under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Corroborate Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 13-year-old girl in a shop confirmed, with sentence of 7 years RI and fine.

The appellant, Arvind Bhagwant Datal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence; Judgment Text Incomplete as to Verdict. Accused Convicted Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for Throwing Wife and Child into Well, Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Testimony.

The appellant, Sambhaji Kachru Kolhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...