Search Results for "continuing business"

1557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Case Due to 24-Year Delay in Adjudication. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 renders it stale and liable to be quashed as abuse of process.

The petitioners, Rachana Garments Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Kumar Bhartiya, challenged a show cause notice dated 27 June 1997 issued by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Where Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature. Failure to Pay Outstanding Amount Under a Commercial Agreement Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC as No Deception at Inception is Established.

The applicant, Manish Shyamsundar Batra, proprietor of M/s. S. B. Traders, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Fishermen Cooperative's Petition Against Demolition of Fishermen Huts in Coastal Zone. Court Holds That Traditional Fishing Communities Have Customary Rights to Occupy Foreshore Land for Livelihood, Subject to Environmental Clearances Under CRZ Notification, 2011.

The petitioner, Mariyayi Macchimaar Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society of traditional fishermen, filed a writ petition challenging the pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 8 Application in Suit for Declaration of Deed as Void. Arbitration Clause in Agreements Held Not Applicable to Challenge to Registered Conveyance Deed as It Is Not a Dispute Arising from the Agreements.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed S.C. Suit No.1512 of 2021 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Vadgaon, Pune, seeking a declaration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...