Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3852 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3852 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Directs Recalculation of Compensation Using 1/1/2014 as Reference Date Under Section 24(1)(a) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013, Where Award Was Made After Commencement of New Act.

The petitioners were owners of agricultural land in Choundi village, Latur district, Maharashtra, which was acquired by the State. A notification unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by NEKRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation of Rs. 10,65,400 Upheld. Claimant Injured in Collision with Bus; Tribunal's Award Based on Proper Assessment of Injuries and Loss of Earning Capacity.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Managing Director of NEKRTC under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Tractor Accident Victim Awarded Rs.1,50,000 with 6% Interest for Fracture Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma, husband and wife, who sustained injuries in a tractor accident on 19.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Releasing Land from Acquisition in Pimpri Chinchwad Development Case. Minister Exceeded Powers Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by Not Recording Reasons and Ignoring Public Interest.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority challenging an order dated 21st September 2004 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.

The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...