High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals in Partition Dispute. Appellants Challenge First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decrees Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
10 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "civil suit dismissal"
3948 result(s) found
Found 3948 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Industrial Development Board in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Board's Failure to Prove Title and Possession Leads to Dismissal. The court held that the Board, as a statutory authority, must prove its title and possession before seeking eviction, and its failure to do so results in dismissal of the appeal.
26 Apr 2016The appeal was filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) and its officers against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012 pas...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit: Time Spent in Order IX Rule 13 Proceedings Can Constitute Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Under Section 96(2) CPC. The Court held that the right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is a statutory right and cannot be barred by dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, and that time spent in pursuing such proceedings can be considered sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908.
7 May 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Bhivchandra Shankar More against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had refused to condone the ...
- 252
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.
30 Oct 2014The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Application to Produce Additional Documents in Suit by NTPC — Belated Filing After Cross-Examination Concluded and Multiple Prior Opportunities Not Availed. The court held that the defendant's conduct indicated a desire to delay the trial and that permitting the documents would cause prejudice to the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1 and Order 13 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
29 Jan 2016The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant, Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), in a suit pending since 2006 filed by the plaintiff, N...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of 12 First Appeals Against Dismissal of Obstructionist Applications in Execution of Specific Performance Decree. The Decree Holder Sought Execution of Decree for Possession of 27 Shops, and Obstructionists Who Claimed Independent Right Were Held to be Transferees Pendente Lite Bound by Decree.
14 Feb 2017The respondent, a decree holder, had filed Special Civil Suit No.224 of 1992 for specific performance of a contract dated 11 May 1987 for the purchase...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Original Defendants Against Restoration of Plaint in Title Dispute. The Court Held That Civil Court Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Title is Not Ousted by Indian Succession Act, 1925 or Bombay Regulation, 1827, as Heirship Certificate Confers No Right to Property.
29 Apr 2025The appeal arose from an order of the lower appellate court setting aside the rejection of a plaint and restoring a civil suit. The original defendant...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Foreign Court's Costs Order. Foreign judgment imposing costs is a decree enforceable under Section 44A of CPC, 1908, and the executing court cannot go behind the decree.
8 Apr 2013The Petitioner, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik, which rej...
- 106
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Suit Against Occupant Who Had Ejectment Decree Not Executed Due to Slum Areas Act. Section 19 of Slum Areas Act Does Not Make Such Occupant a 'Tenant' Under Delhi Rent Control Act, Allowing Suit for Possession on Trespass Ground.
5 Nov 1965The appellant, Lakhmi Chand Khemani, was the tenant of a building in Delhi owned by one M. M filed a suit for ejectment and obtained a decree. While a...
- 80
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Based on Tenancy Act Certificate. Section 38E Certificate Under Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 Confers Ownership, Overriding Subsequent Transfers.
16 Dec 2021The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of ownership, declaration that a Gift Settlement Deed dated 24.07.1987 in favour of the petition...
- 375
