W.A.No.3582 of 2024
6 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "children's act"
5125 result(s) found
Found 5125 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Dispute over ancestral property and limitation period under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 — Held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the appellant's possession was not adverse.
8 Sep 2025The present second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the appellants, Mahadeo Sitaram Navale and Chaturabai Maha...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in POCSO Case; Victim's Testimony Sufficient Despite DNA Exclusion. Conviction Under Section 6 POCSO Act Upheld as Age Proved by School Leaving Certificate Under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice Act.
9 Sep 2021The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 14-01-2020 passed by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenc...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Dowry Harassment Case Conditional on Compensation Payment. Conviction under Section 498A IPC Upheld but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Voluntary Compensation of Rs.3 Lakh to Victim and Children Under Reformative Criminal Jurisprudence Principles.
31 Aug 2021The dispute originated from allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty by the appellant against his second wife, respondent No.2, who claimed to be l...
- 259
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Regularisation of Persons with Disabilities Working on Honorarium Basis — State Directed to Regularise Services Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The court held that the State cannot deny regularisation to disabled employees who have worked for years, as it violates the Act and constitutional principles.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by persons with disabilities who were appointed on an honorarium basis by the Rajmata Bahu Uddeshiya Se...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Offences Under Indian Penal Code and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The appeal challenged the trial court's findings on the victim's age, absence of consent, and reliance on transfer certificate, raising issues under Section 375 IPC and Rule 12 of Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007.
5 Nov 2024The appeal arises out of a conviction recorded by the Special Judge and II Addl. Sessions Judge, Bijapur in Special Case No. 1/2010. The accused/appel...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals in Gang Rape of Minor Under IPC and POCSO Act. Trial Court Convicted Two Accused and Imposed Death Penalty, Requiring High Court Review.
7 Sep 2021The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a death sentence confirmation reference and two criminal appeals arising from Special (POC...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Father's Petition in Child Custody Case, Sets Aside Interim Custody Order. Court holds that welfare of the minor child is paramount and that the father's right to custody cannot be denied solely on ground of mother being natural guardian under Section 6 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
2 Aug 2014The petitioner, Arun Sharma, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31.01.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Margao, in...
- 107
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...
- 221
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.
20 Mar 2013The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...
- 56
