Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

5052 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5052 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Claim of Automatic Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Argued That Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period After Purchase Notice Entitled Them to Release From Reservation.

11 Jan 2012

The petitions arose from the reservation of land in Andheri, Mumbai, for a public garden under successive development plans. The petitioner, Mehtab La...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

27 Nov 2020

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement of Sale — Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Established. Agreement dated 12.08.2004 for sale of property for Rs.75 lakhs with advance of Rs.10 lakhs; defendant failed to execute sale deed; trial court decree upheld.

31 Mar 2016

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.08.2004 for a property in Seegehalli Village, Bengaluru. The plaint...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — Order on I.A. Nos.62 and 64 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A CPC. Court held that documents not produced along with plaint or written statement cannot be received as evidence without leave of court and without showing sufficient cause.

22 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Vinayaka House Building Co-operative Society, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Orissa High Court's Order Quashing Land Settlement in Favour of Temple Managing Committee; Issue of 'Amrutamanohi' Lands Under OEA Act and Temple Act

1 Aug 2026

The dispute centered on the settlement of certain lands in Puri, known as 'amrutamanohi' properties, which were claimed to be part of the endowments o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Rejecting Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Petitioner Failed to Show That Plaint Did Not Disclose Cause of Action. The Court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action as the plaintiff claimed to be a partner of the defendant No.2 firm and sought declaration of his share and injunction against his mother from interfering with the partnership business.

12 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Mrs. Gulshan Rohington Irani, who was the original defendant No.3 in a suit filed by her son Rayomand Rohinton Irani (respondent No.1)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Cross Appeals Over Interpretation of Trust Deed and Maintainability of Originating Summons. The Court Considers Whether Questions Pertaining to Trust Administration Fall Within the Exclusive Domain of the Charity Commissioner Under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.

6 Nov 2012

This judgment arose from cross appeals against a Single Judge's order dated 5 March 2012 in an Originating Summons filed by Charu K. Mehta, a permanen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Maintainability Upheld as Dispute Not Between Landlord and Tenant. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court's ruling in Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil, holding that the bar on Letters Patent Appeals under Article 227 applies only to landlord-tenant disputes under the Rent Control Act, 1999.

28 Oct 2010

The appellant, Ramchandra Krushnarao Pitale, an 87-year-old pensioner, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.6.2009 pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Default Due to Non-Prosecution. Suit Dismissed for Want of Prosecution as Plaintiff Failed to Appear Despite Multiple Adjournments.

8 Jun 2011

The appellant, Sports Field Construction, a partnership firm, filed L.C. Suit No. 1407 of 1994 against the respondents, including the Bombay Municipal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Order — Bhavsar Kshetriya Caste Entitled to Validity Certificate Based on Prior Recognition as Scheduled Caste. The court held that the Caste Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's caste claim was perverse and unsustainable as the caste 'Bhavsar Kshetriya' is recognized as a Scheduled Caste in the Presidential Order and the petitioner's father had been issued a validity certificate.

8 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Vilas Dattatraya Ransubhe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee wh...

83 84 85 86 87

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)