Search Results for "paid"

18233 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18233 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Regularization of Suspension Period and Retiral Benefits for Teacher in Service Law Matter. Period of Suspension Treated as Duty for Pension and Other Benefits Under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sudha Menendbhai Odedra, was appointed as a Vidya Sahayak (teacher) on 14/03/1989 and later promoted to Principal of a higher secondar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Grant of Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Jurisdiction to Correct Award to Include Enhanced Solatium and Interest Under Amending Act 68 of 1984.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 19th February 1992, which granted addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Grant of Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act — Review Application Maintainable as Reference Was Pending on Amendment Date.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 18th February 1992, which granted addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds Grant of Additional Benefits Under Amended Act. Reference Court's Order for Enhanced Interest and Solatium Upheld as Amendment Was Pending Reference.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 18th January 1992, which granted additi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case. Court upholds Reference Court's order granting 15% interest per annum from date of application for additional benefits under amended Land Acquisition Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Judgment and Order dated 6th February 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds Additional Benefits to Claimant. The Court held that the Reference Court had jurisdiction to grant additional benefits under the Amending Act 68 of 1984 as the reference was pending on the date of amendment.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 29th January 1992, which granted addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Judgment and Order dated 24th February 1992 passed by the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Interest Rate of 15% p.a. Upheld Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as Amended in 1984. Court holds that amendment granting higher interest applies to pending references and awards passed after the amendment date.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 26th February 1992 passed by the Joint District Judge, Nashik, in Land Referenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhanced Interest Upheld. Reference Court's Order Granting 15% Interest from Date of Application for Additional Benefits Under Amended Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Affirmed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the order of the Reference Court (Joint District Judge, Nashik) dated 7th February 1992, which granted inter...