Search Results for "layout development"

1136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Reference Court's Award of Rs.5 Lakh for Sewerage Treatment Plant Land. Claimants' Restricted Claim Due to Financial Constraints Does Not Bar Higher Compensation if Justified by Potential Value.

The Deputy Director Town Planning of Amravati Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.215/2003, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Registration of Revocation of General Power of Attorney. Registration of a deed of revocation of GPA by the Sub-Registrar without notice to the original holder is illegal and arbitrary, and the court declared it null and void.

The petitioner, North Roof Ventures Private Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Rejecting Application to Place Arbitration Award on Record. The limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only to filing of application to set aside award, not to filing of award itself.

The petitioner, M/s. Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited (KEONICS), a Government of Karnataka undertaking, filed a writ petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Place Additional Documents in Arbitration Proceedings — Petitioner's Application Under Rule 4(b) of the High Court of Karnataka Arbitration Rules, 2001 Read with Section 151 CPC Wrongly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited, a Government of Karnataka undertaking, filed a writ petition under A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Withdrawal Case — State Government's Endorsements Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed. Land Vests in State Once Possession Taken and Compensation Paid; Government Cannot Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Additional Land Acquisition Officer against an order of a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report and Disciplinary Proceedings Against BWSSB Engineer for Unauthorised Construction Allegation — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Ramesh, an Assistant Executive Engineer with the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Promoter in Co-operative Dispute Under Section 94(3)(c) MCS Act. Co-operative Court's Power to Implead Parties Is Not Restricted to Persons Enumerated Under Section 91(1)(a) to (e) and Includes Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, members of Bramha Suncity Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed Dispute No.106/2021 before the Co-operative Court under the Mahara...