Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

972 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 972 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief and Arbitrator Appointment in Redevelopment Dispute -- Section 9 and Section 11 of Arbitration Act Applications Denied

The High Court dismissed both petitions filed by Petitioner against Respondents -- The Petitioner sought interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Award on Limitation in Commercial Arbitration. Winding Up Proceedings Constitute Civil Proceedings for Exclusion of Time Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a purchase order dated 24 June 2013 placed by Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (petitioner) on Inspira IT Products Pvt. Ltd. (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Challenge to Ex-Parte Arbitral Awards in Favor of Tata Capital Financial Services Limited. Lack of Proper Service and Limitation Barred Setting Aside of Awards Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed by Sawarmal Gadodia, a guarantor, challenging ex-parte arbitral awards passed against him in fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Impleadment of Proposed Defendants in Suit Under MOFA. Court holds that impleadment of persons claiming title to the property is necessary for effective adjudication of the suit under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Mahendra Jayantilal Vora and two others (petitioners) challenging an order of the trial court allowing thei...