Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit — Lease Deed Interpretation and Rent Arrears Calculation. Landlord's Unilateral Adjustment of Security Deposit Held Invalid; Notice of Demand Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act Not Proven.

The appellant, Chandiram Dariyanumal Ahuja, was a tenant of a shop block owned by the respondent, Akola Zilla Shram Wahtuk Sahakari Sanstha, under a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compensation for Defective Cotton Seeds — Procedural Lapses Not Fatal When Defect Not Disputed. Compensation Upheld but Interest Reduced from 24% to 12% Under Maharashtra Cotton Seeds Act, 2009 and Rules, 2010.

The petitioner, M/s Bayer Bio Science Private Limited, a seed manufacturing company, challenged an order dated 29 December 2011 passed by the Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court held that the second appellate court cannot reappreciate evidence and interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court which reversed the tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Will and Adverse Possession. The court held that the document dated 24.10.1960 was a Will and not a settlement deed, and that the appellant failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 30....