Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"

982 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 982 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju Vishwanath Sable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 25.10.2018 in Special Case (POCSO) No. 46 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Upholds Award and Rejects Lapsing Claim. The court held that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not apply where compensation was paid and possession taken under the 1894 Act.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated for the purpose of a public projec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Not Vitiated for Failure to Serve Notice on Unrecorded Purchaser. Civil Suit Challenging Acquisition Award Held Not Maintainable Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the lower appellate court which had decreed the suit in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Legal Representatives Permitted to Add Alternative Prayer for Refund of Advance. Pre-trial amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is to be liberally allowed if it does not cause irreparable prejudice to the opposite party.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff Chintamani Madhav Joshi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution ...