WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2024
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Strike without notice"
1213 result(s) found
Found 1213 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Section 138 NI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Complaint Maintainable at Place of Payee's Bank. Territorial jurisdiction for dishonour of cheque lies where the payee's bank is located, as presentation and dishonour occur there under Section 178(d) CrPC.
29 Aug 2011The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, concerning territorial jurisdiction. The appellant, Cro...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Dispute — Landlord Estopped from Denying Tenancy After Accepting Status and Giving Undertaking for Alternate Accommodation. Principle of Estoppel Under Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applied to Prevent Landlord from Resiling from Earlier Admissions.
10 Jan 2012The petitioner, Pius Bonaventure Fernandes, was a tenant of residential premises in 'Gorden House', Mumbai, owned by Manu Narang (predecessor of respo...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Res Judicata in Trademark Infringement Dispute. Prior Consent Terms and Withdrawal of Earlier Suit Operate as Res Judicata Under Section 11 CPC.
18 Nov 2016The plaintiffs, Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal and others, filed a suit alleging infringement of their registered trademark 'MANIKCHAND' and passing off...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.
2 May 2019The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.
8 Mar 2017The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Application Against Respondent for Willful Breach of Injunction Order in Trademark Infringement Suit. Use of 'NOVA MINI' mark and similar artistic work held to be deceptively similar to registered trademark 'NOVA' and artistic work, constituting contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.
13 Jul 2026The applicant, Dr. Ashok M. Bhat, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'NOVA' and an artistic work used for brilliantine hair cream. In 2007,...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Preliminary Issue Framing in Employee Status Dispute. The Industrial Court Correctly Held That the Question of Whether an Employee is an 'Employee' Under the MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue as It Involves Mixed Questions of Fact and Law.
10 Oct 2022The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (employer), challenged the judgment and order dated November 13, 2021 passed b...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Orders Possession Recovery in Trespass Suit Against Unauthorized Occupant of Tenanted Premises. Statutory Tenancy Cannot Be Bequeathed by Will; Only Heirs Entitled Under Section 5(11)(c) of Bombay Rent Act.
19 Dec 2013The plaintiff, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah, owner of the suit building AlJabriya Court at Marine Drive, Mumbai, filed a suit for recovery of posse...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Reinstatement Ordered with Continuity of Service but Without Back Wages. Daily Wage Worker's Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
24 Jan 2018The appellant, Chandrakant Prabhakar Jadhav, was a daily wage worker appointed by the State of Maharashtra (Public Works Division) on 1 July 1984. He ...
- 118
