Search Results for "Explanation sale"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3173 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

26 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Dated 31.07.2007 Proved and Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Established Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2016

The appellant-defendant filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove possession and title over suit property.

17 Mar 2014

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment an...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Telgi Stamp Paper Scam. Multiple Accused Including Kingpin Abdul Karim Telgi Challenge Conviction Under IPC Sections 255-260, 120B.

4 Sep 2017

The judgment text provided is incomplete and does not contain the final decision. This batch of criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 660/2009, 510/2...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Criminal Appeals Filed by Convicted Accused in Telgi Stamp Paper Scam Involving Counterfeit Stamps. The Accused Were Earlier Convicted by Trial Court for Offences Under IPC Including Sections 255, 258, 259, 120B, 201, 218, 221 and Sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment.

4 Sep 2017

This judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals filed by convicted accused in the Telgi Stamp Paper Scam, which involved counterfeiting of stamp p...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Delivers Judgment in Securities Fraud Case — Accused Face Charges Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for Cheating, Forgery, and Criminal Conspiracy

1 Nov 2018

This criminal case arises from the 1992 securities scam, which severely impacted India's economy. The prosecution alleged that multiple accused person...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Against SEBI's Attachment Orders – Appellants Challenge Levy of Retrospective Interest on Penalty Without Express Provision in Adjudication Order. The core question was whether the Recovery Officer could demand interest at 12% p.a. from the date of original adjudication orders under Section 28A SEBI Act read with Section 220 Income Tax Act in absence of a prior direction for interest, and whether Explanation 4 inserted in 2019 applies retrospectively to pre-existing orders.

26 Jul 2026

The appeals arose from the dismissal by the Securities Appellate Tribunal of challenges to attachment notices issued by the Securities and Exchange Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Vendor's Appeal, Dismisses Vendee's Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Payment of Rent. Payment of Customary Rent Held an Essential Term of Contract, Non-Performance Bars Discretionary Relief Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

11 Sep 2019

The case involves an agreement to sell dated 13.05.1964 between Mohinder Kaur (vendor) and Bahadur Singh (vendee) for sale of land for Rs.5605/-, with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order Under Income Tax Act — Set Off of Long-Term Capital Loss Against Long-Term Capital Gain Permitted. The court held that the reassessment notice under Section 148 was based on a change of opinion and the assessment order rejecting set off under Section 70(3) was unsustainable.

8 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Noshir Darabshaw Talati, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 31 March 2021 for Assessment Year 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

83 84 85 86 87

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)