Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2067 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2067 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Upheld at Rs.7,500 per Are. Comparable Sale Instances Justify Enhanced Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case arises from the acquisition of agricultural land belonging to the respondent-claimant, Ganpat Sonu Khedekar, for the Konkan Railway project. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Compensation of Fruit-Bearing Trees in Land Acquisition Case. The reference Court's dismissal of tree compensation was set aside as the valuer's evidence was unchallenged and the Supreme Court precedent was misapplied.

The appellant, Sau. Ushadevi Manikrao Baradkar, owned land in Gat No. 75 of Village Barad, Tq. Babhulgaon, District Yavatmal, which was acquired for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Market Value Fixed at Rs.99 per sq. yard Upheld as Just and Reasonable Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Location of Land.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (the appellant) under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a housing schem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Claim Due to Non-Payment of Compensation Before Possession. Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates interest on delayed compensation from date of possession.

The petitioner, Dadasaheb Bhausaheb Pathare, owned agricultural land in Wadule village, Parner taluka, Ahmednagar district. His land was acquired by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Claim in Land Acquisition Reference Despite Mutation Entry in Favor of Brother's Family. Court Holds Mutation Entry Not Conclusive of Title and Daughter Entitled to Share as Co-owner Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Sakhubai @ Shakuntala V. Chopde, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Reference Court under Sections 30 and 31 of the La...