Search Results for "single point tax"

1549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's contributory negligence assessed at 50% for sitting on the footboard of a bus, reducing insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Gulam Mohammad, sustained injuries while traveling as a passenger in a bus owned by Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Trust Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Dismissing Petitions for Lack of Proper Authorization. Trust Failed to Produce Resolution Authorizing Filing of Writ Petitions, Resulting in Dismissal.

The case involves a dispute over the management of Paschim Vibhag Shikshana Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, and al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Repugnancy Between Section 28A of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 and Section 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Petitioner Contends That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Probate Revocation.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the constitutional validity of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...