Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1853 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1853 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by Dnyaneshwar Thakare, Shivkumar Yadav, Virendra Kashyap, and Narendrasingh Takkal and Rambharose Malvi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment for Mentally Ill Accused in Rape and Murder Case — Non-Compliance with Section 235(2) CrPC and Supervening Mental Illness Considered

The Supreme Court of India heard a review petition filed by an accused (referred to as 'Accused X') against his conviction and death sentence for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Lack of Independent Witnesses Renders Recovery of Contraband Illegal.

The case involves six appellants who were convicted by the trial court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration. Dying declaration found reliable despite burn injuries to accused and sons, and motive established through illicit relationship and ill-treatment.

The appellant, Bhagwan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Recovery of 100 grams smack fails as prosecution did not prove samples were drawn from entire contraband and seals were not properly affixed, violating Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...