KAHC010211662021_1
31 Mar 2023Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...
Search Results for "board representation"
2420 result(s) found
Found 2420 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Order on Petition to Quash Criminal Complaint in Share Forgery Case — Allegations of Duplicate Shares and Impersonation Reviewed Under IPC Sections 467 and 418 Without Specific Accusations Against Company Officials
16 Jul 2024This criminal petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by United Spirits Limited, a public limited company, seekin...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator and Election Process of Registered Society. Petitioners Oppose Government Orders Alleging Premature Interference Under Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.
28 Nov 2025The matter pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 08-10-2025 by the Dis...
- 18
High Court
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Injunction Order Granting Interim Relief in IPL Franchise Termination Dispute. Division Bench Considers Whether Change in Shareholding Pattern Constituted Irremediable Breach Warranting Termination of Franchise Agreement Under Clauses 10 and 11, and Whether Conditions Imposed by Single Judge Were Sufficient Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
15 Dec 2010Background: The dispute pertained to the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and KPH Dream C...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...
- 1228
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.
25 Oct 2024The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...
- 399
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Short Service Commissioned Officer Denied Third Chance for Permanent Commission Due to Policy Amendment — Directs Parity with Similarly Situated Officers Who Obtained Relief from Armed Forces Tribunal. The court held that the benefit of a judgment in favour of a citizen must be extended to all similarly situated persons without requiring them to approach the court, relying on Amrit Lal Berry vs. Collector of Central Excise and K.I. Shephard vs. Union of India.
13 Dec 2024The appellant, Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel, was commissioned as a Short Service Commissioned Officer in the Army Dental Corps on 10.03.2008 at the age of...
- 772
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Class-IV Employees Terminated Due to Irregular Selection Process. Appointment Based on Interview Without Advertisement Provision Held Invalid; Termination Upheld as Selection Was De Hors the Rules.
7 Mar 2025The case pertains to a batch of appeals by employees appointed as Class-IV employees in Palamu district, Jharkhand, pursuant to an advertisement dated...
- 622
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.
3 Mar 2023The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...
- 349
